An Epistemic Foundation for Authentication Logics (Extended Abstract)
نویسندگان
چکیده
While there have been many attempts, going back to BAN logic, to base reasoning about security protocols on epistemic notions, they have not been all that successful. Arguably, this has been due to the particular logics chosen. We present a simple logic based on the well-understood modal operators of knowledge, time, and probability, and show that it is able to handle issues that have often been swept under the rug by other approaches, while being flexible enough to capture all the higherlevel security notions that appear in BAN logic. Moreover, while still assuming that the knowledge operator allows for unbounded computation, it can handle the fact that a computationally bounded agent cannot decrypt messages in a natural way, by distinguishing strings and message terms. We demonstrate that our logic can capture BAN logic notions by providing a translation of the BAN operators into our logic, capturing belief by a form of probabilistic knowledge.
منابع مشابه
Automatic verification of temporal-epistemic properties of cryptographic protocols
We present a technique for automatically verifying cryptographic protocols specified in the mainstream specification language CAPSL. We define a translation from CAPSL models into interpreted systems, a popular semantics for temporal-epistemic logic, and rewrite CAPSL goals as temporal-epistemic specifications. We present a compiler that implements this translation. The compiler links to the sy...
متن کاملSemantics for Nonmonotonic Logics
A variant is proposed of the preference-based semantics for nonmonotonic logics that was originally considered by Shoham (1987,1988). In this variant it is not assumed that preferences between standard models are aggregated into one preference order. This allows the capturing of all main nonmonotonic formalisms, including Default Logic of Reiter (1980). The preferential models introduced in thi...
متن کاملBelief Fusion and Revision: An Overview Based on Epistemic Logic Semantics
In this paper, we formulate some approaches to belief fusion and revision using epistemic logic semantics. Fusion operators considered in this paper are majority merging, arbitration, and general merging. Some modalities corresponding to belief fusion and revision operators are incorporated into epistemic logics. The Kripke semantics of these extended logics are presented. While most existing a...
متن کاملAn Application to a Reflective Architecture: Milord-ii*†
Halpern and Moses [Halpern & Moses, 84] define and characterize what a minimal epistemic state associated to a set of premises is, using the notions of stable set and S5Kripke models. Based on such epistemic states, Halpern and Moses define an entailment relation with which one can infer what is known and, more importantly, what is unknown by an agent. In this paper we formulate an extension of...
متن کاملEpistemic Logics for Information Fusion
In this paper, we propose some extensions of epistemic logic for reasoning about information fusion. The fusion operators considered in this paper include majority merging, arbitration, and general merging. Some modalities corresponding to these fusion operators are added to epistemic logics and the Kripke semantics of these extended logics are presented. While most existing approaches treat in...
متن کامل